Are daily newspaper brands an advantage or an inconvenience? I acknowledge, I do not have the answer. Even if I would like to say that they are an advantage. This question is indirectly the subject of the French journalist Gilles Klein's
post on
his blog Le Phare (the lighthouse).
Gilles reports the initiative of the websites of two French national newspapers,
liberation.fr (
here in French) and
lemonde.fr. They asked their readers to send photographs via MMS (cell phone) or email. The newspapers wanted photos about the protests organized by French students and unions regarding a new job law -- CPE -- making the hiring (and the firing) of young people easier (more about it
here). Almost no photos have been sent.
"The young people do not seem to want to send their photographs to newspapers which perhaps they do not read. They rather post them on Flickr. Type the word "CPE" this morning you have nearly 1,400 photographs", writes Gilles.
Jules, one of Gilles' blog readers, comments:
"the success of Flickr and the disinterest for the initiative of Le Monde and Libé show one thing: the disavowal towards the intermediaries of any kind. We do not need more intermediaries to select, choose, etc. It is time for "disinter-mediation"... "Jules is undoubtedly close to right. But to respond to an initiative, it is necessary to know the existence of it. And sadly, the "young people" undoubtedly did not know that they could send their photos to these two media. Why? Because, as Gilles suggests, they read little to none at all of the print or digital version of these two French national daily newspapers.
But, should they give up trying to attract "young" readers? The answer is no. And for this reason, these initiatives should be supported. Let us hope that they will have many other initiatives such as the one above. But they only have meaning if they are part of an overall strategy. And strategy is not the strength of the daily newspaper organizations.
Maintaining these brands is not going to be easy. Young readers seem to find the answers to their daily information needs elsewhere (free daily newspapers, Yahoo!, etc). Do the newspapers absolutely have to create new brands in order to reach other target markets?
The British regional press, for example, gives the beginning of an answer. It is increasing the portfolio of products. In Newcastle, the total number of media targeting different types of consumers (readers and advertisers) went from 14 to 45 over the past 10 years. Steve Brown, regional managing director of Newcastle Chronicle & Newspaper and Gazette Company Media, declared:
"We have become extremely good at identifying new ways to reach specialist markets and are continually innovating and launching new products" (read more about it
here).
What do you think ? Do daily newspapers have to create products under new brands in order to reach new readers... and advertisers?